High School

If Tom Dooley found a zero correlation between people's foot size and procrastination, this would mean that: A) Foot size and procrastination are positively correlated. B) Foot size and procrastination are negatively correlated. C) There is no relationship between foot size and procrastination. D) Tom's research methods were flawed.

Answer :

Final answer:

A zero correlation between foot size and procrastination implies there's no relationship between them. Foot size doesn't impact procrastination levels, making them independent variables.

Explanation:

If Tom Dooley found a zero correlation between people's foot size and procrastination, the right interpretation would be C) There is no relationship between foot size and procrastination. In statistics, a zero correlation signifies no linear relationship between two variables. In this case, it implies that the size of a person's foot has no effect on their level of procrastination, and they are independent variables.

For instance, a positive correlation between weight and height (the more one weighs, the taller they tend to be), or a negative correlation between tiredness and hours of sleep (the more one sleeps, the less tired they generally feel). But in our main answer, no such relationship exists between foot size and procrastination.

In conclusion, a correlation coefficient expressing the linear relationship between two variables being zero means there is no relationship between these variables.

Learn more about Correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/36761554

#SPJ11

Other Questions